27 Dead in Connecticut School Shooting
Police in Newtown, Conn. were called to an elementary school at about 9:30 a.m. after a gunman allegedly opened fire at the school. The president spoke to the nation Friday afternoon.
Connecticut police said Friday afternoon that 26 people, including 20 children, were killed at an elementary school after a gunman opened fire.
The Scene
Newtown Police were called to the school at about 9:30 a.m. after receiving a 911 call. They alerted Connecticut State Police and authorities began an active shooter investigation once they arrived at the school, according to Connecticut State Police spokesman Lt. Paul Vance.
Authorities said the gunman was found dead inside the school. He was allegedly armed with four guns and a high-powered assault rifle. Authorities said during a press conference that they have retrieved three weapons from the scene.
A parent interviewed on CBS News told the network that his 8-year-old daughter said she heard an argument and cursing over the school’s loudspeaker, apparently coming from the principal’s office. Her teacher then immediately locked the classroom door as a safety precaution. A fourth-grade student at Sandy Hook School told Connecticut’s Channel 7 that he and his classmates were “locked in a closet in the gym” to escape the gunman.
One mother of an 8-year-old girl at the school, Brenda Lebinski, told Patch that her daughter is safe thanks to one teacher's decision to move all kids into a closet when the gunman entered the building.
The Shooter and His Family
Police have not identified the shooter, but reports have said the suspect’s mother was a kindergarten teacher at the Sandy Hook School in Newtown, CT, a town of about 28,000 people an hour outside Stamford where the shooting rampage took place.
Media reports initially identified the shooter as 24-year-old Ryan Lanza. However, Patch has learned that Lanza told friends his developmentally disabled brother, Adam Lanza, may have committed the crime.
Lanza’s friend, who declined to be identified, told Patch he spoke to Ryan Lanza as he was headed home from his job in Hoboken, NJ. Ryan Lanza wrote on his Facebook page that he is not the shooter.
“I’m on the bus now, it wasn’t me,” he wrote.
Lanza’s mother, Nancy, a kindergarten teacher at Sandy Hook, is believed to be among the dead. According to reports, the shooting took place in her classroom. Eighteen children were killed at the scene, while two were taken to the hospital where they later died. The school’s principal, Dawn Hochsprung, also was among the six adults killed. Authorities said another adult at a different location was killed in the incident.
National Response
The shooting, one of the deadliest in U.S. history, has once again touched a nerve about the country’s gun violence.
During a press conference this afternoon, President Obama visibly wept, saying "we’re going to have to come together and take meaningful action about this, regardless of the politics.”
The president also said “our hearts are broken for the parents and survivors, as well. For as blessed as they are to have their children home tonight, they know that their children’s innocence has been lost."
Keri R
5:31 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
This thing about being mentally unstable, I don't buy, years ago we had people with mental problems and less medication for the problems and we NEVER had things like this happening. People are just losing it because of the economy and just the world itself today. And yet the government doesn't get it. Money is a big issue causing people to lose it, and people not finding jobs. This kind of thing is going to just keep getting worse until the president does something to get this country back on track. I only see it going downhill everyday.
My heart and soul goes out the the families of the victims and the children that survived because this will haunt them for the rest of the lives. May god be with you all and help you all get through this horrific time.
bob lang
8:29 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
I suggest if you don't know what you're talking about, you should keep silent. Let's not make this political. P.s. I noted that you didn't capitalize God.
Mars
10:47 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
I never capitalize the word god. Never. Bob, you better start screaming blasphemy at the top of your lungs. I see you are itching for a less free, more communist society? Should we attempt to treat Keri R as Russia did members of Pussy Riot?
“If we don't believe in freedom of speech for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all.” - Noam Chomsky
MZ
12:47 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
It doesn't appear that these shootings have a thing to do with money. And one quick question for you Keri, what in the world do you think Obama could/should do to get "this country back on track?"
Murphy-Solon
6:13 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
What a pathetic fool.
Murphy-Solon
7:39 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Well, according to Keri R., it's the economy stupid!!!
bob lang
8:30 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
It's not the economy that's stupid. It's people like Keri making stupid remarks.
Murphy-Solon
8:31 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
You're right Bob, it's a sad day with no room for politics.
Concerned Citizen A
8:35 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
This Sunday, a bunch of people with guns (in plain sight) will be in downtown kent to talk about how we should all go out and buy more guns. Here's what Bill Lillich, the safety director said in a press release:
"Northeast Ohio Carry" will have a group of people (about 20) downtown on Sunday the 16th from noon to 1400. Most of them will be carrying firearms openly and they will be passing out literature about gun laws. Brett Pucillo is the contact person, "
"Again, we have no reason to fear these individuals who have voluntarily notified the police about their intentions. We are simply providing this information in order to avoid unnecessarily alarm."
Great, I feel so safe when I hear that I should have nothing to fear!
I'm staying away from downtown kent on Sunday! I have Christmas shopping to do, I guess I'll go somewhere else...
James Thomas
11:01 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Concerned,
how much would you wager with me that if an unstable person, determined to inflict violence on society at large saw your post, they would not chose to go to downtown Kent at that time either?
Dan LaVigne
10:12 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Do you want to change all this with 40% of all the 300 million guns in American are not registered or have background checks. To change all this and make the politicians listen you will have to have mass shootings in Washington where many of our politians are gunned down. Then and only then will they work to correct this and finally do the work of the people of this country and not the work of everyone paying them money in their compaigns to get re-elected. Put aside all the hate and everyone come together and show support for the families and say prayers that this never happens again
Murphy-Solon
10:51 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
No one stopped Keri from speaking. We just pointed out the obvious flaws of her speech which is our right. The nutcase that slaughtered those children cannot be blamed by any reasonable thinking on the economy and I'm free to say that as well.
Mars
11:02 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
And I am free to post what I wish. Goes both ways.
Murphy-Solon
11:05 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
You certainly are.
Nathaniel Brooks
11:43 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
People blame the president for everything. He really is just one man, an extraordinarily powerful man, but still one man. The real issues here are gun control and people's inability to control themselves. America has this fetish for guns and it isn't helping . You know other countries make fun of us. Canada has like less than 100 gun deaths per year. America has like 50,000+ gun deaths a year. I also notice how the cops on tv are trying to demonstrate a "show of force." The truth is, cops are the clean up crew. They rarely stop a crime while it's happening. If you think the cops are going to save you, you need a reality check. They didn't save any of those children that's for sure. I believe due to media and subliminal messaging some people are cracking under pressure. It seems like long ago, but we were all once kids. Even back then some kids were more messed up than others. Human are a destructive breed. We are capable of marvelous things, but when we hate, it shakes the world. People today don't respect anything; god family, or country.
Nathaniel Brooks
11:45 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Until we really band together there will be more of this to come. This has got to stop people. I remember how this year started with a shooting out in Chardon. This guy stands trial wasting tax payer money and we all know he did it. I guess he deserves due process. Cleveland couple "believed" to have a gun and are mowed down by 136 Cleveland Police Officer bullets, no gun was found. Sounds like tax dollars hard at work. I remember George Zimmerman and stand your ground. There's been another murder in Florida that resulted because an older gentleman was intolerant of some teenagers playing loud music. Football player killed himself and his girlfriend caring his unborn child. A Football player drives drunk and consequently kills his best friend.
Nathaniel Brooks
11:46 pm on Friday, December 14, 2012
Now we have this shooting in Connecticut. Now I know I might be stoned for this comment, but from what I've seen it looks to be a predominately wonder bread suburb in Connecticut. I would guess the people who live there are upper middle class, trying to escape the hustle of city life. Well I think this shows us, you aren't really safe anywhere. Safety is just an illusion that you have convinced yourself to believe. When you fail to reach out for your neighbor, this is what you get. We only have like eighty years on this planet and then it's back to dust. It's really in everyone's best interest to work together, but instead we hold each other down, with boot heels on our brother's throat. Cain killed Able. I would hope we could foster a better tomorrow through shared sacrifice and community, but that's not gonna happen, we're too selfish for all that. When you live by the sword you die by the sword. If you live alone, you die alone.
Adam C. Miller
5:12 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Sad day.
Mike C
8:35 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
All other responsible news outlets have pointed out that the assault rifle was found in his car and not used during the actual shooting. Gun control needs to be discussed with assault rifles at the forefront....not sensationalized by misleading or omitting facts. Shame on the Patch.
tomcody
8:37 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
,,again YELLOW journalism by "PATCH"...!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..
Ed Fisher
5:37 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
There was no assault rifle involved. It is an assault STYLED weapon. Just a hunting rifle made to resemble the real thing. When will the people learn the assault rifles are automatic weapons and are not available without a very restricted Federal license ?
Murphy-Solon
8:48 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
It's not about the Second Amendment, it's about greed.
Jodi Katz
10:43 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Maybe instead of everyone blaming the government or the NRA they should be looking at what goes on in their own homes. Talk to your children, spend time with your children, get to know your children. Many parents today want to put the responsibility of raising their kids on the schools and blame everyone else when something goes wrong. Our children today have instant access to so many things on the internet, we need to be monitoring them better, as well as some of the games they play. Also, bullying can be done on line, by texts etc. we need to be talking more to our children. Lastly, get your child professional help if you suspect any type of mental health issues before something terrible happens, don't you owe them that??
tom m
10:57 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
an armed principal would have gone a long way.......... as would a state law warning that the school reserves the right to use deadly force on any person found on any school grounds with a firearm
Murphy-Solon
11:00 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I respect the people's right to bear arms as so far as they're defensive in nature. Magazine clips were originally devised for the military for purposes that are offensive in nature. We can't eliminate a crazy person's motivation but we can limit the amount of carnage that they are able to inflict.
Mars
11:01 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Nicely worded. I agree.
Murphy-Solon
11:02 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Arm the principals? Yeah, right.
James Murphy
11:27 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
at the very least arm someone in every school with a gun (wildcard) why make every school a gun-free zone, thats asking for a easy slaughter, there is not a lot of mass shootings at police stations
Murphy-Solon
11:07 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Allowing a crazy person to unload 30 rounds in 20 seconds has rendered the average American's right to defend themselves obsolete. Put that in your Second Amendment pipe and smoke it.
MZ
12:52 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
That is only true if everyone else is defenseless. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Murphy-Solon
11:41 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The government has established blood alcohol level limits with regard to driving.
Murphy-Solon
11:50 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The Second Amendment allows a person to bear arms for purposes of self defense. These offensive machine guns render the Second Amendment obsolete. I didn't contradict myself at all. These mass killings will continue and the political balance will shift against you. Time is on my side.
James Murphy
11:55 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
yes then people place a no gun zone sign on the door of their building (they should rename the signs) A WHOLE BUILDING OF UNARMED PEOPLE INSIDE --- FIRE AT WILL
Kim L
12:42 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I do no own a gun and do not ever want one BUT those no gun signs outside businesses always make me feel less safe
Ed Fisher
5:42 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Again....NO ONE had (or HAS ) a machine gun here. Automatic firing weapons may only be possessed by those who have a very restricted Federal permit. And Murphy, I don't understand this "Magazine clips were originally devised for the military for purposes that are offensive in nature." Could you explain ?
Murphy-Solon
11:51 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
You're not of serious mind.
Murphy-Solon
11:53 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
It's sad to see you two joke in the face of tragedy.
Murphy-Solon
11:56 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012
For one to defend the Constitution, he must first educate himself to it.
tom m
12:08 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
you should give a class to criminals about the constitution
Murphy-Solon
12:00 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I'm not blaming the gun or a person's right to bear one but the offensive nature of a 30 round clip has increased the carnage of a gun in an unstable person's hands beyond anything the Second Amendment intended.
Murphy-Solon
12:03 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
That's right, no one blames the car but we place limits on alcohol w/respect to driving. Did that mean that the government took away everyone's alcohol? Common sense limitations are in keeping with the Constitution.
Alex White
2:18 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Yeah, they did. Called it Prohibition. Carrie Nation, a fanatic, went around destroying people's personal property with a hatchet over the debate. Joe Kennedy went about getting filthy rich, bought his son an American presidency. Meanwhile, the thirsty "working stiff" along side the greedy manufacturers fought to get the right to make and drink Hooch back. A majority apparently. They won. Consequently, the government enacted laws to restrict alcohol abuses-- to essentially control alcohol. Weed too. Too many people dancing to the Devil's Jazz, I heard. For some people, the laws worked as a deterrent; for others they did not. That war is still waging-- irrespective of man's laws.
Murphy-Solon
12:05 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
As the mass killings continue, the political strength against magazines will only grow.
Murphy-Solon
12:10 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
I'd rather use the Constitution to tie the hands of the criminal thank you.
Murphy-Solon
12:16 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Finding a solution to the problem is what we all want? That's naive. Today the gun and ammunition manufacturers are salivating at the thought of the increased sales this tragedy will bring forth.
Murphy-Solon
12:40 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The fact that the gun manufacturer's haven't been able to keep up with demand since the election is further evidence that behavior is motivated by irrational thinking rather than by a true Second Amendment concern. Talk about contradictory thought. LOL
Murphy-Solon
12:52 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
You want me to say something about the shooter Super Citizen? Fine, I will. The fact that there are nut jobs out there is a given. We'll never change that no matter how much we try. But, we can limit a nut jobs ability to deliver rounds and give the poor souls in their path a fighting chance to escape.
Murphy-Solon
12:54 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
What do you mean by wondering if they'll "let me stay" Super Citizen?
Earl Elevant
12:59 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Wow! All this talk of eliminating my 2nd Amendment Rights.
Sounds good--just as soon as the Constitution revisionists give up their 1st Amendment Rights.
Deal?
silly sally
1:40 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
gun nuts are an embarrassment to society. guns kill people, they do, it's the truth. if i have to pry your gun from your cold dead hands, trust me i will.
Kim L
3:54 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
thats silly sally exactly how are you going to kill someone with a gun to pry said gun from his "cold dead hands"
Nathaniel Brooks
2:47 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Only one of you cut straight to the issue with facts and that was Brunold. I'll get back to that in a moment. Mr. Confederate Man? I think we all know where this guy stands. I'm, sure he's got a Grand Wizard robe in his underwear drawer lol. Let's just break the name down. Mister abbreviated Mr. is a commonly used English honorific for men, the title derived from master. A confederate is a person who supports the confederate states of America. The Confederate States of America are eleven southern states of the United States of America between 1861 and 1865 who attempted key word attempted to succeed. Man (pl. men) refers to an adult human male. Mr. Confederate man is not a patriot he's a traitor and should be hung form the highest tree. He doesn't believe in a more perfect union. He wishes that the south had won obviously because he supports the institution of slavery lol. His allegiance is to the confederate states of America not The United states of America. Also last time I checked Ohio wasn't a confederate state.
MZ
7:08 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
So we should hang a man because of his Internet name and because he disagrees with you? How very tolerant of you. Who else should we kill because they disagree with you?
Nathaniel Brooks
2:49 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
If the Confederate states are so great why don't you take you and your hillbilly family back down there. Oh I know because there's no jobs down there, they live in poverty, and they are very uneducated. Mr. Confederate man is the problem with this country. Mr. Confederate Man If you don't like America the way it is, no one is stopping you from leaving. Canada, contrary to popular belief is right up the street. They tend to read books up there though, so your welcome will probably be short lived. Brunold hit the nail on the head.. "Here, is your glorious 2nd amendment America: 1865 - In a reaction to emancipation, several southern states adopt "black codes" which, among other things, forbid black persons from possessing firearms." So now we know the truth. The second amendment wasn't to ensure freedom for everyone. It was put into place to limit the freedom of a few lol. And a humble few at that. An injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere.
MZ
7:09 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
All Southerners are uneducated? Painting with a rather broad brush aren't you?
Nathaniel Brooks
2:49 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Twenty children are dead. They will not have the privilege of unwrapping presents under their Christmas tree on the 25th of December. This is tragic. It is also ironic because people always say that guns save lives. Irony is a rhetorical device, literary technique, or situation in which there is an incongruity between the literal and the implied meaning. America has always been a violent culture. Ask a Native American how those peace treaties worked out lol. You see when you take and take and take and then say it's mandated from heaven lol things lose balance. What we saw yesterday was that loss of balance. I saw the guys picture he was a frail thing and probably just needed a friend. No one reached out to him and thus let whatever evil was brewing in his head fester and go unchecked. My heart goes out to those who lost their lives and their families as well. Life is sacred. We can either hang together, or we can hang separately but have no doubt about it we are going to hang. "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." John F. Kennedy I'm just sayin ....
Sammi Mason
5:49 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
so sad. :( i will be praying for those families who have lost a child.
Murphy-Solon
6:12 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Sure Ed, assault weapons and their clips were devised by the military to deliver maximum fire power on the target to suppress the enemy. In a civilian setting, this is an unforgiving barrage of gunfire that does not allow one escape BY DESIGN. The police themselves find it difficult to deal with that sort of firepower. A few years ago in L.A. Two gunman held a whole police force hostage with such weapons. This has made the average American's ability to defend themselves OBSOLETE. As for the restrictions on such weapons, 40% of firearms are sold in this country at shady gun shows that do not require background checks. I can assemble an armory of machine guns w/o any questions being asked. This is a game. When things calm down in a couple of weeks, the NRA will send out a communication that Obama is coming for your guns setting of binge buying. The gun and ammo manufacturers will make out like bandits, the NRA will be rewarded by them handsomely and they'll wait for the next opportunity to do it all over again. This has nothing to do with the Second Amendment and everything to do with MONEY and POWER.
Ed Fisher
8:51 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The weapon used in the Connecticut attack was not an automatic weapon. It takes such a small amount of time to switch an ammunition MAGAZINE that eliminating one which holds 30 or 60 rounds and replacing it with 2 or more holding 15 rounds is a moot point. Same carnage, 2 more seconds time. I go to gun shows. Maybe not the "shady" ones you cite. Fully automatic "assault" weapons are not sold to the general public. Not even to the shooters mother, who owned the gun. If you think you can "assemble an armory of machine guns w/o any questions being asked", there are many who would like to know your contacts. And if you're going to join in the gun control zealots, speak the language. Clips are for paper and hair.
Murphy-Solon
9:00 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
It was just reported on the news that each child received multiple wounds ALL delivered by the rifle. Automatic, semi-automatic makes no difference to me. They are machine guns meant for offensive purposes and are therefore in violation of the Second Amendment by virtue of the fact that it makes defense obsolete. Also, ALL gun shows are shady. Background checks aren't even debatable.
Ed Fisher
9:15 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
"the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." Now exactly where in that are you reading "offensive" and "defensive"? "They are machine guns meant for offensive purposes and are therefore in violation of the Second Amendment by virtue of the fact that it makes defense obsolete." What kind of Constitutional interpretation is that ? C'mon, Murphy, we all are saddened by this, but you're railing at the wrong villain here. And why rant about gun shows ? What have they to do with this tragedy ?
Murphy-Solon
9:25 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
You're distorting the issue Ed. I have no problem with a citizen's right to a weapon to protect his family and home. I have no problem with a citizen's right to bear arms in order to hunt animals. You seem to see no limit to the Second Amendment. Freedom of speech does not allow one to yell "fire" in a theater or threaten the President. If I thought that owning a rocket propelled grenade launcher is my defense of choice, who are you to tell me no? If I thought a biological weapon like anthrax suits my defense interests, then who are you to say no ? Ed, my point is, where do you see the line with regards to the Second Amendment. Where within the Second Amendment is that line drawn? Do you really see the Second Amendment as all-encompassing ?
Ed Fisher
9:41 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
The Second Amendment is what it says. But, as we all know (I thought), there are MANY limitations on the ownership of weapons. No, Murphy, by LAW you cannot possess a machine gun without permit. Or any weapon of mass destruction. Or any ordinance which explodes. The laws on all of this are effective and complete. Haven't had any grenade attacks, have we ? But, except for automatic weapons, firearms are our Second Amendment right to own. So that's where I stand. The lines have been drawn for a long time. Laws exist for all that other stuff already. So, exactly what do you see as "the issue" I'm distorting ?
Murphy-Solon
9:42 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Ed, The Second Amendment: "a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" Do you see yourself a part of a Militia Ed? A part of a well regulated Militia Ed? Are you trying to secure a free State Ed? Do you see the Constitution as a "living" or a "dead" document?
Murphy-Solon
9:49 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Help me Ed, where "specifically" in the Second Amendment do you find a limitation with regards to weapons of mass destruction? I see the Constitution as a living document and not one set in stone. Your limitation with regards to grenades and anthrax suggest that you too see it as a living document since the Second Amendment is silent with regards to technological advances in weaponry. Therefore, it is appropriate for today's society to regulate the terms of the Second Amendment to suit today's reality, right?
Ed Fisher
10:08 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Please refer to the Federal Firearms Regulations Reference, ATF Publication 5300.4 Revised 2005. The Second Amendment, obviously, does not contain all of the prohibitions related to weapon ownership.
Murphy-Solon
10:12 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
As always Ed, I've enjoyed a fair debate with you. I must take my leave at this time because I have to finish "Team of Rivals". This is the book that the Lincoln movie is based on and I have to finish it before I see the movie. Enjoyed the debate.
Ed Fisher
10:21 pm on Saturday, December 15, 2012
Murphy, also, here is a link for your reference: http://www.atf.gov/firearms/enforcement/
MZ
10:53 am on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Whenever something terrible like this happens well intentioned people come out of the woodwork to rail against guns. There is evil in this world, always has been, and always will be.
I look at my guns as protection for me and my family against this evil. Each time these horrific events occur I can't help but think if only there had been one person (besides the shooter) with a firearm, many lives could have been saved.
I recommend everyone carry, open or concealed. Not less guns, but more guns in the hands of good God fearing citizens.
Mark Zetzer
3:38 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Absolutely, I agree with MZ (and no, he's not me even though we share the same initials). What happened on Thursday, and what happened on 9/11 and elsewhere is the result of gun control, not a lack of it. Those poor innocent people senselessly murdered on those planes and in countless schools across the country were unarmed by force of law, a law that violated their fundamental human right to self protection, and their 2nd Amendment right to bear arms as a means of adequate self defense in a world where guns exist. The government and the police cannot protect you from the criminally insane, they can only show up after you're dead to conduct an investigation. Only armed individuals can best protect against the bad people in this world. I find it gravely disappointing whenever tragedies like Newtown are exploited by the ignorant to push more failed policies like gun control. I say this as someone who does not like guns, does not own them or carry them, and is not a member of the NRA. I'm just a human being who wants to live peacefully and happily, and be prosperous by the fruits of my own labor.
MZ
7:02 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Mark, we'll said.
Nathaniel Brooks
3:49 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
I'm sort of wondering, did Mr. Confederate man delete his comments, or did the moderator. I was looking for a debate, but I guess my onslaught left no chance for one. Either way if there's one thing I can't stand it's a coward. Maybe my comments hit a little to close to home. I didn't mean to hurt any one's feelings. When we fail to be critical of each other, consequently we lower the standard.
MZ
7:10 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
You brave Internet poster. So brave!
Nathaniel Brooks
4:17 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Zetzer I see your point, but there are some flaws. Say someone did have a gun on 9/11 and fired upon the terrorists? Do you know how a loss of cabin pressure due to gunshots would affect the ability to fly the plane. Also have you seen airport security? Now we are going to arm everyone? I'm sorry I love people, but I do not trust everyone to responsibly carry a gun. Have you ever gone out to take part in the night life around the area? There's a lot of douches and I would say the average IQ is well below 120. Let's keep the guns in the hands of those responsible enough to carry them.
Mark Zetzer
4:34 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Exactly, only those who can demonstrate responsible use of firearms can obtain a conceal carry permit. On airplanes, there are bullets available that do not penetrate the fuselage. Airplane and airport ownership, traffic control and security should all be conducted in the private sector. For example, armored cars are rarely highjacked because they are owned and operated privately, and as a result the drivers are packing some serious heat and are well trained to defend themselves. The result is better security at no cost to taxpayers and no civil liberty violations. The same should apply to airlines and schools. Teachers are human beings and should be allowed to defend themselves and their students with deadly force. Unfortunately, schools have become the targets of madmen, and more innocent children would be alive today if gun control was removed from schools.
PF
8:01 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Hi Nat I would like to ask you how are we ever going to keep guns from the gangs and drug runners? Anyone can get a gun in any town in America. Thieves and other scum bags look for opprotunity and taking guns is a favorite. I would appreciate someone that does have a permit to carry, looking out for myself and others in times of need. I bet you would love to have that "below average IQ douche" on your turf if you or your family was faced with a nut like the ones shooting innocent victims.
Nathaniel Brooks
4:18 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
People are irrational in nature, not always, but I would say at least 20 percent of the time. That's too large of a margin for me. I think a person does have the right to own a gun in order to protect themselves and their property. However I don't want guns all over the place for instance while I'm eating my burrito a Chipotle. Even trained officers of the law use guns irresponsibly. Cleveland Police Officers shot two unarmed persons a total of a 136 times. I wonder what the officer's motivation was behind that. I don't think it was due process. I doubt the shooter in Connecticut used that many bullets, although those statics have not been released. America doesn't just have a gun problem, it also has a violence problem. You eve wonder why the archetypal American to foreigners is John Wayne? You see once we ran out of Native Americans to shoot, we started shooting each other.
Mark Zetzer
4:50 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
Yes, violence is the problem, not the weapons themselves. In countries where guns are banned the sociopaths use bombs and take a much deadlier toll. In poverty-stricken Rwanda, where guns and bombs were too expensive, nearly a million people were once hacked to death by machetes. Before guns and bombs were even invented, humanity had no problem finding the tools to commit murder. Violence can best be minimized by self defense.
Mars
9:58 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
“Those who attempt to conquer hatred by hatred are like warriors who take weapons to overcome others who bear arms. This does not end hatred, but gives it room to grow. But, ancient wisdom has advocated a different timeless strategy to overcome hatred. This eternal wisdom is to meet hatred with non-hatred. The method of trying to conquer hatred through hatred never succeeds in overcoming hatred. But, the method of overcoming hatred through non-hatred is eternally effective. That is why that method is described as eternal wisdom. ”
― Siddhārtha Gautama
Garry Kanter
5:47 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
If only the first victim had been a gun owner, none of this would have happened.
Oh, wait a second.
Murphy-Solon
10:10 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
You stupid, stupid people. The gun and ammo manufacturer's and their pimps the NRA have fooled you into believing that this has to do with the Second Amendment when it's all about money and power. Over and over you fools buy the corporate line that there is some greater purpose when the goal is money and power. You fear everything. You are cowards at heart. In time, you will be dealt with.
bob lang
11:00 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
I find it interesting that MZ makes a sarcastic comment about a "brave" internet poster but isn't brave enough to post under his or her own name.
MZ
5:15 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
I didnt call anyone a coward like Mr. Brooks did, that is where the sarcastic "brave" comment came from. You see calling someone a coward (like you infered I am) is quite easy and not brave when done over the internet. Mr. Brooks also said a fellow poster should be hung for his views and assumed he was a rascist.
Thanks Murphy, right back at you with the decent guy comment. It is nice to be able disagree with someone on occasion and not be called names or to be threatened.
On a side not bob, I don't post with my name because I wouldn't want my businesses to be picketed or my family bothered because I don't tow the liberal line. There are countless examples of this type of behavior from "enlightened" and "tolerant" individuals.
Bob, I find it interesting that you care what my name is. Why does it matter? Do you care about my gender, race, sexual preference, etc...? On a side note, I appreciate your bravery for posting under your own name. At least I assume it's your name. But I have to admit, your name, real or not, is quite irrelevant.
Murphy-Solon
11:02 pm on Sunday, December 16, 2012
MZ is a decent guy from what I've read but these machine guns were never meant for civilian use.
Ed Fisher
9:05 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
Please, Murphy, for the love of WHATEVER.....I led you to the gun laws....the doggone Bushmaster .223 IS NOT A MACHINE GUN......will you please try to focus on the REAL problem here. The kid had two (or more) handguns capable of doing THE SAME THING AS THE RIFLE IN THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME. The problem IS THE INDIVIDUAL WHO COMMITTED THE CRIME. Not the method used.
Murphy-Solon
9:18 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
Ed, it was reported this morning that the Bushmaster was an AR-15. AR standing for assault rifle. He had magazines with a capacity to for 30 rounds. If you wish to argue nuance, that is your right, but these military grade weapons are machine guns in my eyes. The gun lobby is very powerful in Washington but as the American people see these shootings increasing in number and intensity, the gun lobby's day of reckoning is coming. I found it instructive that NBC invited 31 pro-gun right Senators to appear on Meet The Press and they al declined. Ed, I understand the technical differences between an automatic and semi-automatic weapon but I pointedly use the term "machine gun" for a reason. The gun lobby is very uncomfortable with that term. These machine guns were designed for the military theater and not the movie theater.
Garry Kanter
9:30 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
Amen, brother! Use the words that *you* know to be properly descriptive.
"Peace-keeping" missiles, anyone?
Ed Fisher
4:27 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
OK. Keep calling it a machine gun if it makes you feel better. I'm not the "gun lobby" and the only thing making me uncomfortable is misinformation. The media, Bloomberg, Feinstein, and now even you are intent on slanting the facts to fit your agenda. The root cause behind the Connecticut tragedy is the mental health of the shooter and the inability of our current systems to identify and treat those types early and effectively. To quote Ronald Reagan: " We must reject the idea that every time a law's broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions."
Garry Kanter
4:31 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
I see.
You, alone amongst us Patch commenters, know the causes, and you know that weapons availability had *nothing* to do with the massacre.
You can't make this stuff up.
MZ
5:31 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
Ed, I would have to assume that if the shooter had used a revolver and a shotgun we wouldn't be hearing anything about "machine guns." I wonder what would happen if the shooter tried to use a fertilizer bomb like what was used in OKC? Unfortunately those that are determined to kill have many soft targets to choose from. I blame the murderer rather than the tool they use to carry out their evil deeds.
Dawn Struhar
9:43 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
First of all, God is to be capitalized! It's like not capitalizing texas. It is a name whether you like it or not or are into it or not. Anyway, we need to stop this insanity of violence with a lot of things; helping those in our community that are unstable REGARDLESS of what our civil rights are! If an unstable person over 18 doesn't take their meds, we as a community should step in and be worried and HELP. Another, our gun laws need to be BETTER. Bakcground checks should be a must. Mental health check should be a must. It isn't really about the gun, persay, people can kill without the gun. We need more love in the air, we have hate, but where is the love, the kindness.
Garry Kanter
9:51 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
Great job of lecturing, with ALL CAPS and everything, then admonishing us that we need to "love". That cracks me up every time I see it done.
And I, for one, will spell "god", or any other word, any way I please.
Murphy-Solon
9:49 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
Dawn, we can't predict when a maniac is going to committ such an act. We can limit the amount of damage he can inflict. I just want to give the potential victims a fighting chance to flee.
MZ
5:23 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
Murphy, I agree, we can't predict when I maniac is going to commit such an act. I agree we can limit the amount of damage he can inflict. I disagree with you on how to accomplish these goals. In addition to fleeing, I would like to give them a fighting chance. It is difficult to out run a bullet. Even without a large clip, it is easy and quick to reload a weapon.
Some type of deterrent could have saved many lives. The heroic principal threw herself at the shooter and used her only ability to fight back (her body) and quickly lost the fight. A taser, pepper spray, or a firearm would have certainly been more effective.
Dawn Struhar
10:11 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
I would like to say something here. First of all, God is capitalized because it is in fact a name. Even if you don't believe in God, it's like not capitalizing texas. anyway, This very sad event has everything to do with everything. The way we act as a community, as an individual, the way we treat others, our whining about how we have civil rights and THAT makes it ok for an unstable person to not take his/her meds if needed. I think we need a lot done. Security at our schools. NOT a gun locked up, but a real trained officer, I would be ok with. We need to help the unstable and be THEIR community too. We need more kindness and love around. We need BETTER gun laws. We need BETTER background checks and mental checks on people who want to buy guns. It really isn't about the gun itself, people can kill without guns...
Garry Kanter
11:31 am on Monday, December 17, 2012
I don't believe in texas, either. I wish they *would* seceed.
Mars
3:42 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
Back in the day they just put those deemed "unstable" into insane asylums. What happened behind those closed doors is not pretty. Start with Danvers State Hospital and work you way through horrific tales of abuse and neglect. There is always the rumor that lobotomies started at Danvers.
And no, the word god doesn't have to be capitalized. If using it as a proper noun, then capitalize it. But there are many, many gods in the world and the word itself does not need capitalized. So: Pronouns referring to God should be capitalized. Non-specific use of the word “god” should not be capitalized.
And you wouldn't capitalize Texas?
Ed Fisher
4:53 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
Kanter, if you disagree with anything I wrote, then let's hear your learned opinion. And please, please, enlighten us with your thoughts on why this tragedy happened. Don't think the kid was mentally ill ? I present my thoughts and opinions here same as everyone else. But then, instead of a debate, you gutless keyboard jockeys take shots. You're a real tough guy there, nancyboy.
MZ
5:26 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
Ed, no need to drop to the level of name calling. You are better than that. Your points speak for themselves. There will always be those that disagree no matter the evidence that is staring right at them.
Ed Fisher
5:33 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
Yeah, you're absolutely right. Just let the stupidity of his comments get through for a second.
Garry Kanter
6:38 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
I'm not the guy who explained with absolute certainty what the causes were and were not. That was you.
All I know is that 20 five and six year olds were gunned down by a person with an AR/15 semi-automatic assault rifle. What I *don't* know is if that is what the founders intended with the 2nd amendment. I'm leaning towards "not".
tom m
7:52 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
She knew her son was mentally ill and she frequently expressed her anger at the school system for failing to provide assistance for his condition. So why would she have these weapons at his disposal? and at last I looked a bushmaster is not a high powered assault rifle and I looked up the caliber ....its a .233
Jean Williams
9:17 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Westfield baptist said they are going to protest funerals of sandy hook victims
http://salisbury.patch.com/articles/westboro-baptist-to-protest-sandy-hook-victims-funerals-hackers-get-even
Mars
11:05 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
It's Westboro Baptist. Are you shocked? They think some sort of god sends everything. By their rational we should never seek medical help for any and all ailments are the will of their god. Nor should we do much of anything because to them, it's all their god's will.
MZ
7:35 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
I think the founders would have frowned on the use of a musket or a cannon against helpless school children as well. I might be going out on a limb here but I think the founders might have recognized that guns do not fire themselves, not even scary looking AR-15s. They might have been savvy enough to realize that guns require someone to aim them and pull the trigger. But go ahead and ban them, that will certainly stop evil from happening and all our kids will be safe...just like they are safe from drugs and pedophiles. Last time I checked, meth and child rape are both illegal. I think the constitution is silent on that but I would go so far as to say the founders probably would not have approved of either.
tom m
8:10 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
I never hear of mass shootings at police stations or gun stores .........only at GUN FREE ZONES
Ed Fisher
7:36 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
And I also am aware of those sad facts. And I firmly believe that we must address the reasons behind this terrible act. I am not fixated on the methods used. It's the "why" that we should address, not the "how". None of us can even begin to understand what kind of twisted psycho could conceive of such a thing. "Absolute certainty?" Yes, I believe with absolute certainty that the shooter was profoundly mentally disturbed and that somewhere, sometime, somehow, it should have been identified before he got to that point last Friday. And I know you don't agree, but to me, the weapon is not the issue at all. He could have produced the same horrific carnage using the 2 handguns. Or one. Or a homemade bomb.
Garry Kanter
7:51 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
Those are all conjecture.
"Why" did he do such a horrible thing?
Maybe for the same reason a dog licks himself: Because he could. The weapons were right there in the house.
tom m
8:06 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012
I really think passing a law making it the responsibility of every school to have 1-2 un-named teachers or staff to have their concealed carry weapons at school (pay them a safety bonus) that would make them a wildcard for those looking for easy targets (gun free zone schools) to use a perfect example the colorado movie shooter went past 4 closer theaters to attack the cinemark one BECAUSE it was the only one that banned concealed weapons inside
Mars
11:40 am on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
America's sick obsession with guns.
Mr Confederate Man
1:26 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Its not an obsession. Its just wanting to use our 2nd amendment. Just like you who use the first. It saddens me that so many kids died and all you can do is blame the gun
Earl Elevant
6:50 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Excellent point Confederate.
Where's the outrage at the person who did the shooting?
Why not be angry at mentally ill people?
Why not threaten to enact "Mentally Ill Control," round them up, ban people with certain mental illnesses, and make them wait five days before they want to go outside for any reason?
Mars
9:47 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
The constitution also protects a woman's right to choose. I hope you're as feisty about the 14th amendment as you are the 2nd amendment.
Earl Elevant
1:42 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Since we're destroying the 2nd Amendment, let's list all the others that need some attention:
1st Amendment - Definitely. We need to take away the right to free speech. Too many people say too many hurtful, spiteful things as they scream about eliminating the 2nd amendment. It's time to take that away so we don't have to hear all their crap.
I'd like to see the 5th Amendment go so that criminals can and will testify against themselves.
Let's repeal a couple more & send us back into prohibition.
This is kind of fun--fixing the Constitution the way it *should* be.
Mr Confederate Man
6:24 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
I am bitterly clinging to guns and religion. I bet if bother taught in school, we all might be better off.
I am from the south. I don't like slavery. I am not a klansman. I was raised alot different than you. That doesn't make you better than me.
Garry Kanter
7:05 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
As the eventual President remarked four years ago, folks have good reasons to bitterly cling to guns and religion. Our institutions have failed a lot of people. Unfettered gun ownership, as enforced by the NRA, is one of those failings, resulting in 20 dead babies. That's bad business for politicians and weapons makers.
MZ
8:42 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
How does the NRA enforce anything? Pure jiberish.
Garry Kanter
8:53 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
"Jibberish" is acting like you don't know that the NRA is America's most powerful lobby.
"Malarkey" is, once again, avoiding the subject. The NRA's greatest tactic.
MZ
8:14 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
You sound like Joe Biden. Much like him, just because you say something is so, doesn't make it so.
The #1 lobbying group is the American Association of Retired Persons, followed by National Federation of Independent Business and then by American Israel Public Affairs Committee. The NRA comes in fourth and fifth is the AFL-CIO.
The NRA doesn't enforece anything.
Garry Kanter
9:31 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Standard NRA protocol: Avoid. Trivialize. Deny. Insult.
MZ
1:18 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Garry, What?
You are the one that first said that the NRA "enforced" "unfettered gun ownership" and then said that "the NRA is America's most powerful lobby." I simply pointed out that insofar as actual measurements of either members, or dollars, the NRA is fourth, and that the NRA doesn't enforce anything. The enforecement powers as enumerated in the constitution lay within the executive branch.
The Joe Biden reference had to do with your use of the word "Malarkey" that Biden used in the VP debate. I apologize for the insult and certainly didn't intend it to be one. But after careful consideration I agree, I would be insulted if someone referred to me as in anyway like Joe Biden. See, we have something in common after all.
Garry Kanter
1:26 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
You are expecting me to be naive. And accept your disseminations at face value.
That's not my game.
MZ
11:39 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Garry, I could say the same thing right back at you. You are expecting me to take your disseminations at face value. Not my game either. Are you denying that the NRA isn't the most powerful lobby in America? Are you insisting that the NRA has the ability to enforce something?
Rob Sweet
8:06 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
If you guys really cared about children you would ban drone strikes. Under Obama we have killed 176 Pakistani children. Where is the outrage? People in this country want to take away guns from law abiding citizens. It's really sad, and look into Australia and the UK. Strict Guns laws and the crime is including shootings.
Garry Kanter
9:13 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
PROCLAMATION: On this thread regarding the Newtown tragedy, I, Garry L Kanter of Cleveland Heights, Ohio hereby ban drone strikes.
Murphy-Solon
8:44 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Jiberish is a cool word MZ.
MZ
8:54 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Murphy, I have had several posts get deleted over the past few days. Ever happened to you? Worst case, my posts may be sarcastic, but I never post foul language or call names, post threats or anything like that. Not sure what is going on. Maybe I offended the "patch masters" in some way.
Murphy-Solon
8:57 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
I've never had a post deleted but I have had posts flagged as inappropriate. It seems some posters use the flagging device as payback even when it's not inappropriate. I've never seen a post of yours that I've found offensive.
MZ
8:16 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Ah, perhaps I am getting flagged. What a bummer.
Murphy-Solon
9:48 pm on Tuesday, December 18, 2012
Touché Brunold, touché.
Mr Confederate Man
2:26 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Has anybody noticed that once we removed God from the school, we keep getting in more and more trouble.
if you are so anti gun, then really join the NRA. See what it's really about. Most of the stuff that you guys are saying here, is only half truths. Boast you don't even know what you're talking about. The NRA which
BI am a part of, is not just protecting our right to bear arms. It's about being responsible. It's about knowing the law. What does the NRA have to dowith the kid shooting all those kids
Garry Kanter
3:43 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
If God is stymied by a Supreme Court ruling on school prayer, he's not so powerful.
The NRA is everything people say it is. The must be neutralized.
Mr Confederate Man
2:30 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Liberals what do you expect to happen if they put a restriction on firearms? Do you think this will solve it? Your nuts if you do. I think we need to find a viable solution to this problem. Never once talked about the gun. I haven't read any where that has had anything to say about the kid that pulled the trigger. But that can't be his fault, it's the guns fault. Do you think the NRA condolences?
Mr Confederate Man
2:34 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
If more Americans had guns, the crazy people would get off less shots. So banning guns, bans the solution. You'll never stopthe crazy people from getting guns. you're just banning me from protecting myself and my family. And you just given criminals a bunch of free targets.
Garry Kanter
3:45 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
If only the killer's first victim had been a gun owner, the whole thing would have ended there.
Oh, wait...
James Murphy
9:56 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
here is the other side of the story
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/121712-637367-sandy-hook-tragedy-prevented-at-clackamas.htm
Garry Kanter
10:03 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
The guy had problems with his gun.
James Murphy
10:18 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Garry please you are much smarter than that, his gun problems as "reported" did not stop him from shooting himself with the same weapon
Mars
10:44 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
No one should be able to leave the house without have an AK-47 tucked under their arms. Right? Maybe we should all travel around in tanks?
Garry Kanter
10:46 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
I wrote what the article said. Screw you.
Murphy-Solon
8:31 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
It has been my experience that the truth can usually be found by following the money. Some speak of the high ideals of the NRA. That's naive. The NRA is the official trade group for the gun and ammo manufacturers. The majority of NRA revenue comes from these manufacturers. The goal of these manufacturers is revenue growth and the NRA lobbies Congress to help achieve that goal and is rewarded financially for their efforts. The Second Amendment is secondary to the NRA. Their First Amendment is money and power.
James Murphy
10:15 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
this has been buried in the news >>>> At the Clackamas Mall in Oregon last week, an active shooter murdered two people and then saw that a shopper, who had a handgun carry permit, had drawn a gun and was aiming at him. The murderer's next shot was to kill himself. >>> here is the link to the buried story http://www.kgw.com/news/Clackamas-man-armed-confronts-mall-shooter-183593571.html
Mr Confederate Man
10:39 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
So, what your saying is, banning guns would have prevented this or from happening in the future. Your nuts. Where there is a will, there is a way. Please, be smarter than what you are suggesting
Murphy-Solon
10:41 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Take your own advice Conferderate, no one suggested that the shooting could have been avoided. The extent of the slaughter certainly could have been prevented. Read more closely next time smarty pants.
Murphy-Solon
10:48 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
What if my weapon of choice is a hand grenade? The Second Amendment is silent on hand grenades.
Ed Fisher
11:05 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
We've already been down this road and you know full well where the limitations for weapons exist. Here it is for you again. Federal Firearms Regulations Reference, ATF Publication 5300.4 Revised 2005. Why you seem to insist on attacking the Second Amendment is puzzling. The gun control laws in this country are extensive and thorough. Enough with the Second Amendment, already. So much for intelligent debate.......
Mr Confederate Man
10:49 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Rifle_Association this is the facts. NRA relieves no money from gun or ammo manufacturers. Please stop spreading lies that you tell. I pay dues to the NRA. Please get your facts straight before you speak.
I will keep my guns now. There is nothing you can do to stop me from owning my firearms. There are too many gun owners both Republican, independent and Democrats that own firearms.
Murphy-Solon
10:52 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Now who's not being smart. If you care to look at something other than NRA propaganda you will realize your comments about NRA funding are patently false.
Jean Williams
10:53 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
I do not own a gun and will never own a gun (my choice) but I am beginning to think that gun free zones are the problem (if you posted a sign at a cities borders saying the town is 100% gun free including the police not permitted to carry guns) would the city be safer
tom m
2:30 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
I find it interesting how the anti-gun posters pretend your comment does not exist ..............I think the town would be safe for only as long as it takes the word to get out to the criminals ...............banks would be the first to close up followed by the stores
Mr Confederate Man
11:03 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
So What you're saying is wiki reporting false information? You're not gonna be able to stop gun ownership. You are way out numberEd. the Liberals our way out numbered
Murphy-Solon
11:05 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
You obviously are unaware of what the WIKI format is. Educate yourself.
Mr Confederate Man
11:07 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Don't be a sore loser
Murphy-Solon
11:10 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
You actually support my point Ed. The gun lobby are the ones that hide behind the Second Amendment, not me. You are right in saying that our society has imposed limitations on the Second Amendment. In my opinion, you are wrong to think lobbying and money has drawn the proper line.
Ed Fisher
11:39 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
I'm certainly not a fan of big money or influence. Nor am I a member of the NRA. Nothing about lobbying or money really affects my position on gun control. I believe in the rights afforded me by the Second Amendment. I am a gun owner, and a CCW permit holder. I believe, as a law abiding citizen, that I have the right to possess any legal firearm I desire. Law abiding, conscientious gun owners like myself believe that the "proper line" has already been drawn by the existing gun laws, and further controls are not needed.
Mars
11:19 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Next thing you know photos from America will look like the photos from the middle east where everyone has a gun and multiple weapons.
It amazes me how gun advocates are unable to admit guns serve no purpose than to kill. The military didn't develop all their goodies to fluff pillows and make cotton candy. They are to kill.
Ed Fisher
11:29 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
That's exactly right. Try kicking in my front door. Car-jacking me. I will not be a victim. You choose to wait for someone else to come to your rescue. Take care of you. Protect you and your homes. Your loved ones can feel secure in knowing that help and protection from the world we live in is just minutes away. But I choose to be responsible for my own protection, And for that of my home and family. So you choose your way. I've chosen mine.
Mars
4:26 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
I'm so sorry you're life is framed in fear.
Murphy-Solon
11:37 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
No one debated the rights you describe Ed.
Ed Fisher
11:54 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
OK, I'll bite......how is the "gun lobby" (NRA ?) "the ones that hide behind the Second Amendment," Who's hiding ? From what ? The Second Amendment speaks for itself. What's to hide ? I'm sorry, Murphy, but, honestly, your train of thought here escapes me. (with respect)
Mr Confederate Man
11:46 am on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Nobody said a word about the shooter. Did he have a doctor, may be prescribed the wrong medication.
If this guy I had taken a car and hit a bunch of kids god forbid, would you guys be blaming the car?
How often do you hear of sane people comiuting this crime? But it still guns for right?
tom m
2:26 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
only if it was a SUV
Mr Confederate Man
12:17 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Its sad that I have to defend my amendments. I respect your first, why can't you do the same for my 2nd
Garry Kanter
1:27 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
All 10 Amendments belong to all of us.
That "divide and conquer" NRA tactic has flown it's last flag.
Mars
4:15 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Your amendments? They are every American's amendments.
I hope you're including the 14th in "your" amendments and all it entails.
Murphy-Solon
4:29 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
I can respect the Second Amendment but disagree with it's interpretation. When the framers talked about a well armed Militia I'm certain they didn't mean having the capability of firing 30 rounds into elementary students in 20 second intervals. But, that's just me.
Garry Kanter
4:38 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Of course. I got a buddy who just called me a "hypocrite" for being a weapons owner, but not being an NRA-type.
I guess *he* (and his NRA buddies) gets to decide who can be a gun owner?
Nathaniel Brooks
9:45 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Brunold keep fighting the good fight. I doubt most people here want to talk about all the amendments or what the constitution truly represents. They only focus on the parts of the constitution that benefit them lol. This country has a long history of accountability issues and the ramifications for that irresponsibility can be seen more clearly today than at any other time. You see due to the fluidity of information it's becoming harder and harder to get away with telling a lie. Although a master of deceit will still do it well. Midwesterners love their guns and bibles until they walk into the wrong movie theatre and don't walk out. People rarely take a stance on an issue unless it directly affects them. Basically someone close to them is going to have to perish at the hands of a criminal with a gun for them to understand. Then perhaps they will think rationally and act responsibly. Don't hold your breath. The purpose behind the creation of the AK-47 was not and is not home defense. We still have this childhood fixation with John Wayne and Rambo lol. You live by the sword you die by the sword.
Garry Kanter
10:03 pm on Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Anybody not affected by 20 dead babies is already spiritually empty.
Ed Fisher
7:55 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Brunold, save your "sorry". I'm just fine. Not fearful at all. Just a regular guy who recognizes the world around me as one different from the one you watch on TV. I'm a realist. I don't look to you or others to provide me with security. Never have. So that's the view I have. We won't agree on this. No need to be confrontational. If you are happy being comforted and protected by others, good for you. My hope is that I never need to shoot at anything other than the occasional paper target. I also hope that you and others like you are never in need of protection from anything. Unfortunately, the daily news continually destroys that hope.
Mars
10:17 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
In my many, many decades on this earth I've yet to need to shoot anyone with a gun.
Murphy-Solon
8:15 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Ed, I agree with you in principle but I don't think it is fair to say Brunold depends on others to protect him. I've never owned or touched a gun for that matter. Most people killed in their homes are killed by someone they know, especially women. I can name a longer list of mass shootings in a public place in 2012 then I can home invasion shootings by strangers. I respect your right to bear arms at home but disagree that those who don't have guns are depending on anyone to protect them.
Ed Fisher
9:38 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Murphy, it's not theory, just reality. Who protects your home ? Your family ? At least be honest about it. Reality now, not Ozzie and Harriet. According to a United States Department of Justice report: 38% of assaults & 60% of rapes occur during home invasions. 1 of every 5 homes will experience a break-in or home invasion. Now, who provides security if (Heaven forbid) the door comes crashing in at your home ? I'm just a guy who believes in personal responsibility for this protection. I think that is what the Second Amendment if all about. The world is what it is. Those who choose to abdicate their security and protection to others must at least admit to themselves and their loved ones that that's the choice they've made and live with it.
Kim L
8:43 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Son, we live in a world that has walls and those walls need to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines; you have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives and that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives.
You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use then as the backbone of a life trying to defend something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you," and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest that you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.
Mr Confederate Man
9:30 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Thank you Kim! I was drilled fair, firm and consistent
Murphy-Solon
8:45 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Ah Kim L., that was a movie referring to a military. You provide me nothing. Let's be clear about that.
Mr Confederate Man
9:28 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Woot woot
Our governor just signed another pro gun bill. Now we are permitted to have a gun in our vehicles on state property. Awesome!
Murphy-Solon
9:44 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Ed, I have said you have a right to have a gun at home. I'm abdicating nothing. If someone breaks down my door, I'll deal with them. General policing aside, no one protects me but myself. I don't live my life in fear. I'll take of my own business a fashion of my choosing.
Mr Confederate Man
9:46 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
I know I only see things one way. I was raised with guns. I was drilled with the ar15 in my hand. It saved my life, yet took others. Life changes everything when you are being shot at. It changes everything also when you see your team being shot..
I can't help but wonder what you would do lets say out to eat and someone comes in shooting up the place. It sounds as if you would jump up and say "hey, I am anti gun, your not supposed to have that gun" I bet you would not like the outcome. I bet you would want someone like me there to preserve human life. The cops can't be everywhere. It takes time for them to come after 911.
Also, I view it as the sorrow dieing would bring to my family, knowing I could have lived. You do not see it like that. I could and would protect myself and you if given the same situation., but you want to ban the very thing that could save your life.
To sum it up, would you want someone there who has a concealed weapon if you were getting robbed? I would hope you would. There are over 300 million guns in America, you can't stop that
Garry Kanter
9:51 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Nobody is talking about banning anybody from having weapons.
Your narrative changes nothing about the risks and benefits being discussed. Nor does it make you a better American than me, or a better analyst than me.
Murphy-Solon
9:58 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
America has armed themselves to the teeth with 300 million weapons and now find it a necessity to add more. You people have created your own self fulfilling prophecy and are too blind to see that.
Mr Confederate Man
10:45 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Gary, please read my prior comments. We are all equal. I never said anyone was better than anyone else. Please get your facts straight. It makes you seem unintelligent, I hope you are tho. Knowing that American have guns eats you up inside. Feel free to stay home and live in the world you want to create. For me, I will survive
Garry Kanter
12:01 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
"Knowing that American have guns eats you up inside." - MCM
Don't speak on my behalf.
Mr Confederate Man
10:53 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
All this talk about guns and ammo really inspired me to go to Walmart, yes Walmart and buy a box of ammo. Do you know why, because I can. Its legal and my god given right.
Mars
1:14 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
An abortion is also legal and is every woman's god given right should she choose that aisle (an nice tropical isle would be nice though).
Mr Confederate Man
10:55 am on Thursday, December 20, 2012
And if that's not your your type of thing then you always have the right to not go down that isle. Please don't try to block that isle from others. Its not your job.
Garry Kanter
12:02 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
And, as usual, because facts, law, and opinion are against him, the NRA-type kicks over the checker table.
Murphy-Solon
12:19 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Touché Gary, touché.
Garry Kanter
12:51 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Thanks, man. It's the same regurgitated, taught progression, each and every time. After all the distractions and accusations comes more accusations, followed by the dramatic exit.
But there's nothing else the NRAists can do. There's no possibility to dazzle us with their brilliance of their position, and now they see that the baffling us with their BS act doesn't work any more.
I mean, how can a whole group of people be in support of
slaughtering babies? Who do they expect to win over?
Mr Confederate Man
1:04 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Go to www.atlanticfirerms.com or go to any gun website and see for yourself. All gunsales are now closed due to too much demand. Try and find an AR. You cant, even I cant. Millions of Americans are buying guns. The ATF is backed up for hours for background checks. Kinda scary even for me. The fact that I cant buy a gun right now due to out of stock scares me. I am glad I have my weapons now
Mr Confederate Man
1:16 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
www.atlanticfirearms.com
Murphy-Solon
1:18 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
"The fact that I can't buy a gun right now due to out of stock scares me" ? Then why not try courage for a change.
Mr Confederate Man
1:33 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Why is my courage in question?
Mr Confederate Man
1:32 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Well, who's right, millions of Americans or 3 guys on the patch. Last I knew it was the majority vote that counts
Mr Confederate Man
1:36 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Here's some numbers for you. The population is 311,000,000 people in America. There are well over 300,000,000 guns out there now. You do the math, no gun owner will ever give up the right.
Garry Kanter
2:14 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
And when all else fails, the NRAist will retreat to the safety of some inane numerical happenstance, and claim some victory of some sort.
Murphy-Solon
1:37 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Because a guy who professes to have an arsenal of weapons used the word "scared" twice in his last post because gun sales have clogged the system. You have nothing to fear but fear itself.
Mr Confederate Man
1:47 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
who says I have an arsenal of weapons. I only own 1. Check the registration for yourself. The word "scare" is said was used as a figure of speech. I meant it as that millions of people are buying guns and now the prices will go up.
Furthermore, I hope that no one is taking personal this conversation. I am rather enjoying it because I get to see the otherside of things. The people I hang with are pro gun. Kinda nice to see that it make people uncomfortable to be around guns
Mr Confederate Man
1:58 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
The police detain the killer that morning. The mother was trying to have the shooter committed. But it still the guns fault
Garry Kanter
2:10 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Gun? Was a weapon involved? Oh, that's news to me! I thought he just threw those bullets through those 20 slaughtered babies.
Mr Confederate Man
2:29 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
I should be careful what I say. I don't want to alarm anyone and don't want the law paying me a visit. I just sold my gun just now but I am still pro amendment
Mars
2:46 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Pro 14th amendment, too. Right?
Garry Kanter
2:54 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
This just in...
The Unabridged NRA Statement
Wed, 12/19/2012 - 9:35amAuthor: The EditorsSPIN-SANITY DEPT.
"On Tuesday, the National Rifle Association released its first statement regarding the horrific shooting in Newtown, CT. It was brief and concise — mainly because much of the original draft was edited out. Fortunately, a copy of the unabridged version was made available to us."
http://www.madmagazine.com/blog/2012/12/19/the-unabridged-nra-statement
Mr Confederate Man
2:56 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
And also the fifth.....lol
But why is no one talking about the shooters mental condition too?
Garry Kanter
3:02 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
"But why is no one talking about the shooters mental condition too?" - MCM
That's a false question. Certainly people are talking about that. But there's very few people defending a mental patient's right to bear arms. What's left to discuss?
On the other hand, as has been the case for decades, the NRA forces are out there - here - defending certain aspects of the slaughter of 20 babies.
So, naturally, caring, feeling, thinking human beings respond to that that.
Mr Confederate Man
2:56 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Garry, you are quoting mad magazine?
Mr Confederate Man
2:58 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Really mad magazine? Its gotta be true then.
Probably should have thought your last comment or are you trying to be funny
Garry Kanter
3:05 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
I proudly posted that Truth from Mad Magazine. Discuss any problems you have with them, with them.
The NRAists are not part of the mainstream. The Mad link is just an example. There's countless more.
Mr Confederate Man
3:19 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Your the one that posted mad magazine...... why were you not questioning his mental condition? Does that not bother you?
Thank-you for posting the mad magazine post. I needed the laugh, but don't worry, it doesn't make me question your judgement or sincerely. It doesn't affect all the other posts you made. Lol. Good one
Garry Kanter
3:20 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Words you'll never see an NRAist post:
"You've made a valid point. However..."
MZ
5:50 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Certainly words you'll never hear, you would have to make a valid point first.
Mr Confederate Man
3:27 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Okay I'm really serious. WHY DO SHOOTINGS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE ONLY HAPPEN AT PLACES WHERE YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE A GUN. and that's a fact. The answer is right here
Garry Kanter
3:39 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Another false question, not worthy of response.
Mr Confederate Man
3:29 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Garry, What would happen If something like this for What happened to your kids. Would you want someone therewho Had a firearm? I try not to think about it What I would want someone to shoot back
Garry Kanter
3:35 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
...And right on schedule comes the hypothetical scenario. As if I have never considered such a scenario. Or as if my *opinion* on some conjectured situation changes the *fact* of 20 slaughtered babies.
Mr Confederate Man
3:34 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Why do you want The government control more of your life
Garry Kanter
3:37 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
I don't defend words or ideas I haven't posted or implied. It would seem you are clutching at straws at this point.
Mr Confederate Man
4:10 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
And your credibility comes from mad magazine
Garry Kanter
4:14 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Another pointless comment. I don't think I'll respond again until something better gets posted.
Mr Confederate Man
4:27 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
I would too if I quoted mad magazine. Where is brecksville anyway? I didn't realise this wasn't my city
Garry Kanter
4:59 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
I guess you're not familiar with Twain, Rogers, Kelly, or the other great political American humorists.
Mr Confederate Man
5:43 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
No, I am not. I still don't know how gun control would have stopped this. If anything, we need more guns. WHY IS THE GUN IN QUESTION? WHAT ABOUT HIS MENTAL CONDITION?
Mr Confederate Man
7:49 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
And how many guns does an “average American” own? If you count everyone in a gun owning household as a gun owner, the average American gun owner owns three guns. If you only count those who have put their money on the counter the average American gun owner owns nine guns.
You can take your choice – but we have enough guns in circulation in the United States to arm every American man, woman, and child twice over.
And violent crime is still inversely proportional to the number of guns in LOCAL circulation. More guns mean less crime. Each and every time.
Stranger
UPDATE As of July 1, 2012, there are at least 78 million individuals who have “filled out a 4473 and put money on the counter.”
Those gun buyers and their families add up to 244 million Americans who live in a home with a gun, and have some claim to gun ownership.
http://extranosalley.com/?p=2917
Mars
8:16 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
The rate of death from firearms in the United States is eight times higher than that in its economic counterparts in other parts of the world.
The overall firearm-related death rate among U.S. children younger than 15 years of age is nearly 12 times higher than among children in 25 other industrialized countries combined.
In 2003, there were 30,136 firearm-related deaths in the United States; 16,907 (56%) suicides, 11,920 (40%) homicides (including 347 deaths due to legal intervention/war), and 962 (3%) undetermined/unintentional firearm deaths.
At the current homicide rate, roughly one in every 240 Americans will be murdered
Mr Confederate Man
8:51 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Brunold, your numbers seem to be way out of fact. So what you are saying is roughly 120 people in Kent will dies by murder? If a population is 30,000. Not even close! You will never hear of a person killed who owned a gun legally by a gun.
I can guarantee I will not be 1 of the 240, but your numbers are way out of porportion.
I also would like to know who you compared the US to get your numbers. Lets compare apples to apples now
Mars
9:14 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
You don't seem to be a big fan of factual data.
http://www.americanbar.org/groups/committees/gun_violence/resources/the_u_s_compared_to_other_nations.html
Mars
9:19 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
In 2010, guns took the lives of 31,076 Americans in homicides, suicides and unintentional shootings. This is the equivalent of more than 85 deaths each day and more than three deaths each hour.
73,505 Americans were treated in hospital emergency departments for non-fatal gunshot wounds in 2010.
Firearms were the third-leading cause of injury-related deaths nationwide in 2010, following poisoning and motor vehicle accidents.
Between 1955 and 1975, the Vietnam War killed over 58,000 American soldiers – less than the number of civilians killed with guns in the U.S. in an average two-year period.
In the first seven years of the U.S.-Iraq War, over 4,400 American soldiers were killed. Almost as many civilians are killed with guns in the U.S., however, every seven weeks.
Mars
9:19 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
In 2010, unintentional firearm injuries caused the deaths of 606 people.
From 2005-2010, almost 3,800 people in the U.S. died from unintentional shootings.
Over 1,300 victims of unintentional shootings for the period 2005–2010 were under 25 years of age.
People of all age groups are significantly more likely to die from unintentional firearm injuries when they live in states with more guns, relative to states with fewer guns. On average, states with the highest gun levels had nine times the rate of unintentional firearms deaths compared to states with the lowest gun levels.
A federal government study of unintentional shootings found that 8% of such shooting deaths resulted from shots fired by children under the age of six.
The U.S. General Accounting Office has estimated that 31% of unintentional deaths caused by firearms might be prevented by the addition of two devices: a child-proof safety lock (8%) and a loading indicator (23%)
Jean Williams
11:29 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Suicides accounted for 55 percent of the nation’s nearly 31,000 firearm deaths
Mr Confederate Man
7:59 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/18/15977143-gun-control-offers-no-cure-all-in-america?lite
WOW! This has a ton of info!
Murphy-Solon
8:37 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Excellent Brunold, expounding on that info, Americans represent 5% of the world's population yet we posses 50% of the world's firearms. See a self-fulfilling prophecy here?
Mr Confederate Man
8:52 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
America owns 50% of the guns in the world, are you smokin crack to believe that
Mars
9:23 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
The Small Arms Survey is also useful - although it is from 2007, it collates civilian gun ownership rates for 178 countries around the world, and has 'normalised' the data to include a rate per 100,000 population.
It shows that:
With less than 5% of the world's population, the United States is home to roughly 35–50 per cent of the world's civilian-owned guns, heavily skewing the global geography of firearms and any relative comparison
Mr Confederate Man
3:42 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
Liberals are way out numbered when it comes to firearms. More people own guns today than ever before. I was at my local gun shop and he recieved over 10 calls about him having any AR15 for sale. I dont know why I bother debating because owning firearms is a way of life here. I do enjoy this. It feels good to be on the winning team
Murphy-Solon
8:39 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
At least will lead the world in something, right Brunold?
Mr Confederate Man
8:55 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Name one gun law that has worked in saving lives? Would you believe in NYC being a safe city? What about Chicago, they seem to be real safe to walk in. The mayor of chicago had to ask criminals to lay off the kids in his speech.
WOULD YOU FEEL SAFE TO WALK THE STREETS OF NYC AT NIGHT? I wonder ?
Murphy-Solon
8:58 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
Mayor Bloomberg brags that New York City has the lowest crime rate of any major American city. Let me see: Confederate or Bloomberg? Confederate or billionaire? I think I'll go with Bloomberg on this one.
James Murphy
9:29 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
murphy that is an old skewed statistic, here is the updated one http://www.villagevoice.com/2012-10-03/news/new-york-crime-rate-rising/
Murphy-Solon
9:31 pm on Thursday, December 20, 2012
It is not skewed. Brunold was kind enough to state the source.
Mr Confederate Man
3:36 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
Jean, so banning guns will curb suicide? Whats next, the Brooklyn Bridge because people commit suicide there too.
so you would feel safer walking in NYC than in my street?
There is no way to see how many lives were saved by firearms too
Murphy-Solon
6:52 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
How does 20 dead children qualify you as being on the "winning" team. You're disgusting Confederate.
MZ
7:29 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
Ban all guns. We should also start a petition to make evil illegal as well.
After we have rid the US of guns and evil, I say we move to make drugs illegal as well! Since I was a kid I have heard that drugs kill, I can't believe we haven't done anything about drugs yet. We should actually start a war on drugs.
After we have removed guns, evil, and drugs from the US, we should use that momentum to start a war on poverty. With the help of the government we can do anything. What he we passed a law that made cancer illegal?
I would also like to ban alcohol, sugary drinks, greasy food, swimming pools, and cars.
Murphy-Solon
7:31 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
I thought you were better then that MZ. My bad.
MZ
8:09 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
I also motion that we start a movement to ban doctors. Not counting the killing of innocents during abortion, 780k+ are killed by doctors on accident (as opposed to on purpose in the case of abortions).
MZ
8:20 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
On a side note, I'm off to purchase a Sig Sauer P522 today. It really is an impressive firearm. It fires NATO .223LR ammo ( which is abundant and cheap) and is rediculously accurate for a "pistol" or short rifle. At 18" long, it can fit nicely in a back-pack with plenty of room for extra clips and rounds. The version I am getting will have a nice laser site and I will add a pressure switch LED as well. Is p522 will be added to my collection that has never been used to kill a man, woman, or child.
I also own rope, kitchen knives, multiple cars, and blunt instruments (baseball bats and the like) that have never been used to kill anyone.
Mr Confederate Man
9:51 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
20 kids are dead because they were in a concealed carry free zone. It makes our kids easy targets and that makes my blood boil. The ferry think you're trying to ban is a very thing that could save their lives
Mars
12:17 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
No, 20 children were killed because a human being with weapons of mass destruction walked into a school and shot them. With a gun. With bullets. With a simple move of his finger, he ended lives. Guns kill. Guns are so good at killing that even toddlers can easily kill with nothing more than moving their finger less than 1 inch.
Mr Confederate Man
9:55 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
I can just see you now jumping up and telling the criminal that he's not allowed to have that gun he has pointed at you. I'm sure you'll get through it will change his mind. I'm sure he'll go Wow, I didn't know I wasn't allowed to have a gun. I'll have to swing by the police department and turn it in. Because you know if you can own a gun, that neither can he. And that is exactly what you're saying Murphy
Mr Confederate Man
9:56 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
Alcohol kills more people than anything else combined. I'm sure you're kicking back right now drinking a few. But that's okay for you
Mars
12:20 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Actually (and quite factually): More deaths are caused each year by tobacco use than by all deaths from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, suicides, and murders combined.
Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in the United States.
http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/tobacco_related_mortality/
Mr Confederate Man
10:02 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
There's a fact. 25 people died last year from plastic bags. 90 percent were kids under the age of 4. I bet you have a few plastic bags in your house right now. And you're okay with that. The same thing applies here. You are so double standard
Mars
11:30 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
Plastic bags have all sorts of uses from transporting items to storing items to keeping them safe from the elements. Guns, unfortunately, only kill. They serve no other purpose.
Mars
12:14 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Imagine the carnage and horror had the man walked into the school with a few dozen Ziploc baggies.
Mr Confederate Man
11:15 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
The cause and the solution are 1 in the same
Mars
11:32 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
More guns does not make us safer. That's like saying more unprotected sex will result in less pregnancies.
Earl Elevant
11:47 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
And restricting guns to legally-purchasing responsible gun buyers doesn't make us safer either.
Mr Confederate Man
11:42 am on Friday, December 21, 2012
Well shooting is in the Olympics. Its recreational and competitive. You never hear of a sane person doing anything like that. What if he had run his car into a bunch if kids (god forbid) would it still be the cars fault? Do you want to ban cars now. Its the same thing. Giving the gov more power to tell people what they can do and what they can't do sounds like communism, but your probably for that too.
Mars
12:11 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Cars transport you from point A to point B. Guns kill. The only reason for the existence of guns is to kill. Vehicles are there for transportation. Guns are there to cause death.
Garry Kanter
12:46 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
I think the focus should be on how to prevent these all-too-frequent mass murders.
That would be *within* the framework of the 2nd amendment *and* reduce the number of babies slaughtered.
Very pro 2nd amendment!
9:28 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Would you prefer less than lethal ammo?
http://www.firequest.com/index.html
Mr Confederate Man
12:51 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Alright I give up. I really don't have anything else to bring to the table. I am almost sure that will see a gun ban or some kind of restrictions soon. I'm glad I got rid of all my guns.
MZ
4:09 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
So, I am convinced that all guns should be banned. Let's start tomorrow. What's the plan?
Garry Kanter
4:22 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
The plan? The grownups will begin discussing things. Gathering data, understanding the law, comparing alternatives. The others will stomp their feet, and hold their breath, 'cause that always worked before.
MZ
4:36 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Ok Garry the grownup, start discussing things. Gather data, then what? It's ok, we all know you have no idea how to get what you want. You can hurl insults all day, it doesn't change the fact that you have no plan. Can't wait to see what Biden comes up with.
Garry Kanter
4:51 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
I did not insult anyone.
MZ
8:05 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Garry, my bad. I didn't realize you we're referring to yourself when you typed about stomping feet and holding breath. It is now makes perfect sense to me. Sorry for the confusion but please continue to cry and stomp your feet to your hearts content.
Mr Confederate Man
6:15 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Hey why you guys are at it, can you ban cellphones too. Everyone wants to text and drive. I think it's their soul purpose. I'm a truck driver. I see it all the time. I blame Verizon Wireless. How dare they make a schedule a product like that
Mr Confederate Man
6:32 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
You guys are starting to sound like communist. You're not going to have that in this country. But you do have a shot at socialism though
Murphy-Solon
6:50 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Schmidt, just to let you know, each one of those children had between 3 and 13 gunshot wounds in their little bodies. The gun used was capable of delivering 30 bullets in 20 seconds. You go tell the parents of these children that the gun is not a machine gun.
MZ
8:01 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Would the parents feel any less of a loss if it were one bullet? If the shooter had a shotgun and a five minute head start, would the results have been that much different? What if he only killed 15, or 10, would the outrage be any less? Go ahead and ban "machine guns" but don't be surprised if nothing is solved. Don't be surprised if killers continue to kill. Force must be met with force, or at least the threat of force. When you need the police (and God bless them) and seconds count they are five minutes away.
Very pro 2nd amendment!
9:24 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
The AR used was registered to the mom BTW.
Mr Confederate Man
6:53 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
Can we move this conversation to another post. It's taking me forever to scroll down
Mr Confederate Man
8:12 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
I feel so bad for the parents
Mr Confederate Man
9:09 pm on Friday, December 21, 2012
I might agree with some of what you say, but it would take a strong police force. If we where I live had a police chief like brimfield then yes. Sadly, I live in Kent.