patching...
Update: Don't miss out on Brecksville news. Sign up for the free Brecksville Patch newsletter. Click Here. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices
Owner of TheNotMom.com: commentary, chat & info for & about women w/o children.

The Onion Controversy: Is The C-Word Ever Funny?

There used to be an amusing website called The Onion, chock-full of parody and satire about current headlines and pop culture. Used to be.

On the Sunday evening of Oscars 2013, someone at The Onion decided to send out a disgusting tweet about the youngest-ever Best Actress nominee, Quvenzhane Wallis (left), star of Beasts of the Southern Wild. You can read it for yourself here.

The Internet, especially the Twitterverse, quickly exploded in outrage, posting more than a dozen tweets per second.

The tweet was taken down within an hour of its posting, but the action was too late. (Note to self: Nothing dies on the Internet.) People were urged to unfollow @TheOnion on Twitter, send emails, contact media, and demand a public apology. By Monday morning, they got the apology they were seeking. The Onion CEO Steve Hannah issued a statement, saying in part:

On behalf of The Onion, I offer my personal apology to Quvenzhané Wallis and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences for the tweet that was circulated last night during the Oscars. It was crude and offensive — not to mention inconsistent with The Onion’s commitment to parody and satire, however biting. No person should be subjected to such a senseless, humorless comment masquerading as satire.”

The controversy didn’t stop there, in part because of reactions by former Onion staffers. In addition to issuing a parody of the apology itself, they declared that  Mr. Hannah’s remarks showed a loss of “editorial freedom” and the first-ever retracted tweet. One ex-Onion writer said, “It wasn’t a great joke, but big deal.”

Again, seriously?

Anyone with a sense of humor understood there was an intention to make fun of an adorable child star and Hollywood’s treatment of its starlets. But, it was a joke gone horribly wrong. Some complainers even wondered if race played a role, noting that The Onion had never issued such an attack against Dakota Fanning, for example.

If you’re wondering why this story appeals to TheNotMom.com, it’s not because 9-year-old Quvenzhane doesn’t have children of her own. It’s because if people think it’s funny to call a little girl a c–-t, is it hilarious to call you one?

Eric Majkut

3:59 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Geez, you ladies are uptight. Words only hold as much power as you allow them to. Maybe if you relaxed a bit you wouldn't find it so offensive.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Thomas

9:32 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Mr. Majkut,
Try JUDEN, try riddah, try the n-word, try teabagger,, try some of the other soul killing names that people have labeled others with over the years. Words have power.

Comment_arrow

Nolan

9:59 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

You missed the point. *golf clap to Mr. Thomas*

Comment_arrow

Teresa K.

10:38 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

eric: so you wont mind if we refer to your mother, sister, g/f or daughter as that word?
they wont be offended, will they?

I look forward to seeing your female family members at the grocery story and calling out: "hey, _____ ! how ya doing today?"

Eric, the person who was called the word, was NINE. Do you think she KNEW what that word meant before the other day?

Comment_arrow

James Thomas

11:07 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

No Joe,
you missed it. It sailed high and wide over your head.

Comment_arrow

Nolan

1:23 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Wow...what a response there, James. One can tell from that response, you're about as bright as a 3w LED.

Comment_arrow

James Thomas

4:33 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

I think Teresa K. gets it far more than you do Joe.

Comment_arrow

Mars

6:30 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

“Words are like eggs dropped from great heights; you can no more call them back than ignore the mess they leave when they fall.”
― Jodi Picoult

Comment_arrow

Kim L

8:02 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Eric I tend to agree, now the world is full of roving bands of "do- gooders" with no sense for bad humor trying to create a happy happy joy joy world

Hope Moskal

8:52 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

If people called me the c word, I would smile and say "and don't you forget it."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Teresa K.

10:39 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

hope, some people are so concerned about not being noticed at all, they will welcome any attention.

Nolan

9:59 am on Thursday, February 28, 2013

The Onion "controversy"?

I don't recall their bad tweet every being considered a "controversy."

Someone who runs the Twitter account for The Onion tweeted something very stupid, and the CEO issued an apology the next day. It was done.

Time to move along.

Reply

Anne Payne

12:26 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

I think the bigger issue here is that the whole Oscar event was riddled with misogynistic jokes, and this was just thought to be "just another joke". Jokes are great when they are appropriate, but the sophomoric humor that was displayed at what is supposed to be a upscale and classy event was just unacceptable. It goes back to manners and civility. I love humor and I am by no means uptight, but there are limits. It is easy for someone to say “get over it”, and maybe we will, but a nine year old girl was called a reprehensible word because she DISPLAYED JOY after seeing a clip of her performance on screen at an awards show. Think about it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nolan

1:26 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Uhh...no. You are aware of what The Onion is, correct? Most people do (unless it's Mitch McConnell, R-KY, then you don't lol).

It had nothing to do with The Oscars allegedly being riddled with "misogynistic jokes."
It was a stupid tweet by someone at The Onion. Simple as that.

Anne Payne

3:06 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

Hi Joe, way to see the bigger picture. I know the Onion, however, just because it was a stupid thing to do, it does not make it ok, and one might argue that the atmosphere of the show ( in which the host really did have a 'let's put down women" fest and why the producers allowed it is another story) encouraged said "stupid tweet". I really believe lanquage has power, and this was an unecssary barb. And just because there was an apology issued, also does not mean everything is ok and can go back to the way it was.

Reply

Mars

6:33 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

'Cunt' is a synonym for 'vagina', though this is only its most familiar meaning. As a noun, 'cunt' has numerous other senses: a woman (viewed as a sexual object), sexual intercourse, a (foolish) person, an infuriating device, an ironically affectionate term of address, the mouth as a sexual organ, the anus as a sexual organ, the buttocks, prostitution, a vein used for drug-injection, a synonym for 'damn', an attractive woman, an object or place, the essence of someone, and a difficult task. It can also be used as an adjective (to describe a foolish person), a verb (meaning both to physically abuse someone and to call a woman a cunt), and an exclamation (to signify frustration). Despite its semantic flexibility, however, 'cunt' remains our highest linguistic taboo: "It has yet, if ever, to return to grace" (Jonathon Green, 2010).

Reply

Mars

6:35 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

trend towards repetitive usage of 'cunt' seeks to undermine the taboo through desensitisation. If 'cunt' is repeated ad infinitum, our sense of shock at initially encountering the word is rapidly dispelled. With other swear words (notably 'fuck') gradually losing their potency, 'cunt' is left as the last linguistic taboo, though even the c-word can now be found adorning badges, t-shirts, and book covers. Its normalisation is now only a matter of time.

Reply

Mars

6:36 pm on Thursday, February 28, 2013

What 'cunt' has in common with most other contemporary swear words is its connection to bodily functions. Genital, scatological, and sexual terms (such as, respectively, 'cunt', 'shit', and 'fuck') are our most powerful taboos, though this was not always the case.
In Totem Und Tabu, Sigmund Freud's classic two-fold definition of 'taboo' encompasses both the sacred and the profane, both religion and defilement: "The meaning of 'taboo', as we see it, diverges in two contrary directions. To us it means, on the one hand, 'sacred', 'consecrated', and on the other 'uncanny', 'dangerous', 'forbidden', 'unclean'" (1912).

Reply

Leave a comment