patching...
Update: Don't miss out on Brecksville news. Sign up for the free Brecksville Patch newsletter. Click Here. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!
Local Voices

To Dome or Not to Dome?

This topic was a hot one today on the radio as Browns fans continue to circulate rumors (and wish lists) around what impending owner Jimmy Haslem should (or should not) do once he comes into power.

My own opinion about a domed stadium has changed since 1999. Back then, I felt strongly that it should be an open air venue, similar to what the old stadium felt like. After all, bad weather is a great equalizer and considering the franchise had just hit the reset button… we needed all the help we could get.

However, now that I’m a bit older I see the other side of the coin. Think about the events that Cleveland could attract AND what that would do to help revitalize a lakefront that has less attractions than a zoo on Mars. Seriously though, think… Super Bowl, NCCA Final Four, Big Ten Championchips, etc. Besides, do you really like those bone chilling games in December or do you prefer to stay at home during those weeks?

What's your take?

Earl Elevant

12:49 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012

Well yeah. It's a no-brainer.

Give Cleveland the chance to host a Super Bowl. (Probably not *participate* in a Super Bowl, but we'll take what we can get.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Justin Waite

1:41 pm on Saturday, September 15, 2012

Lol - Earl, I was thinking the same thing! The one thing I've continued to hear is that there would be other challenges with winning a Super Bowl Bid. Mainly, the lack of Hotel space downtown. If only they could get Burke Lakefront airport out of there and build some restaurants/hotels right there on the lake.

Melissa Bysura

12:50 pm on Sunday, September 16, 2012

You took the words right out of my mouth Earl!

Reply

Ralph Solonitz

11:17 pm on Monday, September 17, 2012

put a dome up with Browns money, we are already paying for this football stadium which only gets used how many times?

Reply

JIM STARKEY

9:25 am on Tuesday, September 18, 2012

It never ceases to amaze me that the Browns fans want anyhting but a good team. A new roof??? They got rid of old team ( Baltimore), which by the way won the Super Bowl the following year with the same old Browns players that couldn't win a game here, got a new owner, got a new stadium, and it all remains the same. A very lousy team. The Browns are one of the few teams never to be in a Super Bowl, let alone win it. Don't see how a roof could possibly help this group of blundering nitwits. Maybe we should just turn it into a tornado shelter, there has not been a touchdown at the stadium for decades.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave

10:40 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Hmmmm...
the first comment makes as much sense as the last comment...
"browns fans want anyTHing but a good team" .. Name me one who is hoping for a BAD team....
AND "there has not been a touchdown at the stadium for decades" Right.....

Its this kind of "fan" who see's and reads what is printed and comes up with this kind of "logical thinking" that keeps our city a "mistake on the lake". How about a positive attitude? Come on.... If Mr. Haslem is spending the dollars to improve the team (I think we have to wait until he actually takes control of the team to expect that) it seems to me that the cost and funding of a dome is a very seperate issue.
Lets try and look to a brighter future than whats being done here....

JIM STARKEY

10:57 am on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Well Dave, wouldn't it be nice. Must be nice to be so naive!! As far "as waiting to see
whats done here"---- I don't mean to brag but I am not a Browns fan. The fans have waited since ???? about over 50-60myears. Is that not long enough? Waited thru owner changes, coachinmg changes, stadium changes, player changes, etc. Sounds pretty patient and optimistic to me. And while you all are WAITING the rest of the teams will be winning and some will be going to the Super Bowl. So you wonderfully patient fans can keep waiting and watching good teams am\nd dream of a win!! And thias is my positive attitude--- I AM POSITIVE THAT IN MY AND PROBABLY YOUR LIFETIME WILL NOT SEE A BROWNS TEAM WIN THE SUPER BOWL. You either have the patience of Job or thementality of a Cleveland sports fan!!! Some of what I said was meant to be taken as a funny joke. But the real joke is on you ! Look around with your eyes wide open and watch several NFL games, and think about your Browns. It will not be longbefore even you and your positive attitude comes t realize just how far away they are from "good"

Reply

Justin Waite

1:53 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

What I find so interesting about the comments thus far is how close minded they are. This decision has a far greater impact then on the NFL team that calls it home. This kind of movement could bring 100's of events to the area and 1000's of jobs over time. Remember 'Field of Dreams'? "If you build it, they will come". I see "they" in this equation as jobs and NOBODY can deny that Cleveland could use some of those.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave

2:51 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Justin, your exactly right... hence my statment, that the cost and funding of a dome is a seperate issue. Seperate from....folks that are admitted non Browns fans that tries to be funny by whining about a "non winning" team. The good that could come of "roofing the stadium" could be huge. But its the public outcry and the opinions of "I am positive we will never win the superbowl" that dampens any forward movement. It seems you must win it all and only then do you have a reason to do capitol improvments to your facility.
And to Jim, my comment is not to belittle you, just to say I am as frustrated as ANY Cleveland sports fan, but I will not be one that you see with a Steelers sticker on my car, or a Yankees jersy on my back. Its called Loyality.... and hope.

Debbie S.

2:24 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

The operative word there is "could." Better to spend the money on the schools or invest in a proven revenue generator like Playhouse Square.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Justin Waite

2:31 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Playhouse Square is awesome! I do think that domes are also proven revenue generators.. Look at Indianapolis. Look at Detroit. Both have hosted Super Bowls and many other events like the Big Ten Championship, and NCAA final 4. That kind of stuff fills up hotels and restaurants. Unfortunately, for Cleveland, we currently lack the latter. (Hotel Space)

Comment_arrow

JIM STARKEY

3:53 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Debbie, absolutely!!! you are 100% correct. A roof on that stadium would not make the list of 10 things Cleveland needs.

Comment_arrow

Justin Waite

4:02 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Jim - I'll bite. Top 10 list of things that Cleveland needs. GO!

Myron Thomas

10:09 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

A lot of folks talking about concerts, final four, and who knows what.
Name me a CURRENT single act that could possibly come close to filling a stadium show? Older groups could do that back in the day. But now a days that really isn't possible.... No act wants to work a half empty dome.

Read something no less than two weeks ago that Final four may start looking at non-dome facilities. Heres the link:http://collegebasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/09/06/ncaa-considering-moving-the-final-four-out-of-domes/

It's a silly waste of time. But if the owner foots the bill, because he will get all of the revenue from said activity. Then good for him. But I personally think it would be a waste of cash...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Justin Waite

8:54 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Hey Myron! Radiohead could fill Cleveland Browns stadium 2 times over. (you only asked for 1 so I won't go on) Additionally, a music festival (bringing several bands together) would helps solve for 'the half dome'. As for college basketball looking at non-dome facilities... I don't doubt it. They KNOW they could fill up a football stadium. That said, my questions to you is... how attractive is the weather in Cleveland during March Madness? It's hard to play basketball on an ice rink. Agreed?

Comment_arrow

Myron Thomas

7:21 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Radiohead? The fifth highest grossing tour last year is going to fill the stadium twice? Only if it's the only two shows in the continental US. Are they good? I guess....But they are no U2 or anything like that. And the Stones aren't getting any younger. They only beat Van Halen by 300K....Van Halen!! We could go on about who could fill what...

Could it happen. Sure. 5 to 6 times a year. What are ya gonna do with the other 340 or so open dates?

Music festivals are great. In Europe... Isle of Whyte, Donnington, Wacken, I could go on. Ironically all held outside. Coachella, outside I believe, is not going to be moving to Cleveland. Numerous so called festivals that go on in the US play at places like Blossom. Why? Because Ozzfest is not going to pull 60K+ in Cleveland.

The domes that the final four play in ARE football stadiums. They are played, it's over. And if you could peruse the link they are looking at the east and west coasts because the domes are not near where they want to "be." You think they'll make an exception for Cleveland?

Look I just don't dig the "build it and they will come," type of thinking. That's what we were told when they rebuilt the High school stadium and I have still not seen the numerous band festivals, soccer tournaments, and so forth that were promised. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.

MZ

9:06 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

A dome is acceptable if it isn't used during Browns games. Put the dome up to attract Rock shows, the SuperBowl, Final Four, etc...but please leave the statium open for the games.

Is that an acceptable compromise?

Reply

JIM STARKEY

10:40 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

This is reply to Justin regarding my comment about the top 10 things Cleveland needs. Let me start by pointing out to you that what ever the cost, the final cost willbe passed on to ALL OF YOU. Cleveland has the following distinctions: ranks 7th of most dangerous cities in America, ranks 698 out 746 in School ratings; Ranks very high on school truancy;ranks extremely high on crime; unemployment is above 22%;, ranks very high on foreclosures, and abandoned homes, I can keep going if this doesn't bring you to common sense level. So I stand by my saying a domed stadium could not help majority of its citizens. I point out that the idea begins to make us realize that all of us are over the top when it comes to sports. Never realizing what the cost really is. Even if new owner pays this---it will be reflected in higher EVERYTHING for the fans.. It is not going to do one good thing for most of the citizens of Cleveland.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Justin Waite

11:02 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Jim - (your response is extremely well thought out!) agreed the COST is the key factor here. Until you can understand the ROI model, it doesn't make sense to do anything. However, if the return is greater than the investment, it becomes hard to say no to. (even if you and I pay for it) You bring up excellent point about crime, schools, foreclosures etc... I think it's a stretch to say putting a roof on the stadium won't do 1 good thing for most of Cleveland though. Think about it this way... Cleveland locks down a bid for the Super Bowl. (I think the NFL would do it given the history of the city and the fact the Hall of Fame is an hour away) The event fills up ALL the hotels in Cleveland for the entire week. Restaurants have to turn people away, bars are packed, concert tours follow the flow and book big shows that weekend etc... Everyone who works at those places makes out, spends that money with your business and my business. New jobs are created in the tourism sector of the city and tax revenue is established with ongoing events. Increase in tax revenue allows the city to put Police back to work, re-invest in the school system, sell foreclosed homes and so on and so on. That said, I can't say that it would all happen over night and I can't say it would be easy. What I can say is that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Forward thinking is the only thing that can save Cleveland.

Brandon Tidd

11:10 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

To me... it's not football in Cleveland unless it's below freezing. We always seem to have an edge over the warmer climate teams when they play us on cold days.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Justin Waite

11:19 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

What about the Red Right 88 game? A team from Sunny California comes into Cleveland Stadium in sub zero temperatures and executes almost perfectly the entire game.

The original Bill

11:19 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Haslam has gone on record that if a dome were put on it would be open during Browns games. I am all for this idea. It would be a big boost to the City of Cleveland to have a domed stadium. As far as paying for it I think they should just extend the sin tax. I don't smoke or drink so it wouldn't even affect me. BTW thanks to all you smokers and drinkers for paying for the 3 new stadiums we have here.

Reply

Dan Georges

2:06 pm on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Put the money into a winning team, and then we'll talk "Dome."

Reply

Leave a comment