It has been noted that there is no law requiring a presidential candidate to release tax returns. That fact is correct. However, Mr. Romney's own father set the standard for transparency on this issue when he released 12 years of his own tax returns. Mr. Romney states that he doesn't want to release his tax returns because he is afraid of negative political attacks. I don't believe that being afraid of what might be done with the information is a sufficient reason for Mr. Romney not to release his tax returns. More likely, people will be more angered by the preferential tax treatment that Mr. Romney has received from the current tax code. Mr. Romney is asking for us to consider him for the presidency of our country. In such a position, he will be setting tax policy and also signing tax laws. How can we assess his view of the tax code without knowing how he applied the tax code to his own income?
The argument is made that a person is "smart" to use every tax loophole that is available. Of couse it's well known that many tax loopholes have been given to specific special interests. Lobbyists ply our elected officials with money and in return they get preferences that ordinary working people do not get. There are many tax strategies that push the envelope on legality. When someone has their money all over the world and uses foreign tax havens, we have an interest, as the voting public, to make sure that we agree with the tax strategies used. We have a right to know that Mr. Romney, or any presidential candidate, has been loyal to our country in their pursuit of their wealth. Tax returns will give us that information.
Requesting information from a candidate in order to make an informed vote does not make a person jealous of wealth nor does it imply that wealth is evil. I am angry though about the 15% "carried interest" loophole that allows millionaires and billionaires to classify their income as investment income rather than ordinary wages. Also, let me again repeat the question: How does someone get an IRA worth up to $100 million dollars? I want an answer to that question. Doesn't everyone want an answer to that one?
There is that argument out there that 49% of people don't pay taxes. I believe the statistic is that 49% of people don't pay federal income tax. Working people pay local, state, Medcare & Social Security taxes. Even if people don't work they pay sales tax & gas taxes. It's not fair or correct to make the statement that people on the lower income scale do not pay taxes. So do we want to increase federal income taxes on the working poor so the wealthy can have more tax cuts? I don't know, you tell me.
What I want most out of our government and those who represent us, no matter what political party, is transparency. I want to know who funds their campaigns and to whom they owe a debt. I want to know if they've been moral in the way they've conducted themselves in their personal and business lives. As they make business decisions, have they been loyal to our country and the American people. That's what's important to me and that's why I, along with prominent people from both political parties, call on Mr. Romney to release his tax returns.
No one mentioned anything like that. The concern is the large influence a very wealthy person or corporation has on politicians, especially after Citizens United. "And, being wealthy does NOT necessarily mean one is corrupt." Corruption isn't the topic either. Everyone knows that these wealthy people who have a low tax percentage are playing by the rules. Everyone also knows that their limitless donations to Super PACs is legal as well. The concern is that politicians are influenced more so by the wealthiest individuals, therefore creating the laws that are in their favor, such as the current tax code and Citizens United, among other things.
-foreign tax haven: not enough knowledge on this, so can't comment. I could spout off as others have, what is said in the news, but I try to be informed. -deduction for horse - again, need more info. But, I believe some can deduct a swimming pool for health reasons. As she has MS, probably qualifies. -IRA- how many times do I have to educate you on this? You obviously don't know how IRA's can accumulate. So, the fact that I like a few things that Obama has done, including a few in Obamacare - but it was created under his arrogance without input from everyone, it needs redone - that means because I favor Mitt you think any opinion I have is partisan. You are wrong. I pick and choose issues regardless of the party. Independent.
foreign tax haven: need more info to assess this deduction for horse was a "business" deduction...not medical - need more info IRA- I don't need education on how an IRA accumulates. What I need is to understand how someone gets $100million + in an account that is tax sheltered. If it's legal everyone should know that kind of thing goes on...I'm not saying it's wrong...but I'd like to know more I don't mind you favoring Mitt...I never said favoring anyone was wrong. I never said there was corruption or that we should redistribute wealth. I just want to see more of his tax returns as do 54% (and growing) of the American people. If he doesn't release them....well the people will judge that.
Oh, and pay no attention to that woman behind the curtain. She just likes to be argumentative, rude and annoying (and always right)! Thanks!
Exactly! In fact, ALL people who run for President, Senate or the House of representatives should be required by law to give us the same information that is required of a person who needs senate confirmation Again, I don't believe this is a partisan issue. P.S. uuhhh.. I think we all know the wealthy live by a different set of rules. How else did Wall Street cause a financial meltdown and then get bailed out? Both parties are guilty in this.
you work on your guy and I'll work on mine. I believe (personal opinion with no need to justify) Romney will be more honest than President Obama in this matter.
"The trouble is that congress exempts itself from requirements that it imposes on everyone else." This is a so bipartisan effort in Congress, will you publicly work to end it? I will.
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 10 Aug 2012 at 03:10:31 PM GMT is: 15,910,306,286,553 WAIT UNTIL INTEREST RATES GO BACK UP AND SEE HOW THIS NUMBER EXPLODES>>>
To your comment, this is fun to answer. Taxes are group laws so it is our collective business. Imagine please: it is legal to burn the USA flag. But I would want to know if a presidential candidate did. What you do in the bedroom (which the conservatives want to control) is an individual issue. Individual laws should never be passed. Spanking children is a group issue because of the science proven cause>effect so laws should be passed on these. And your last obtuse statement: the institution of economics can not and should not be run like the institution of government. See my blog on government vs. business. Run government like a business becomes a disaster. ,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/10/jon-huntsman-mitt-romney-tax-returns_n_1765592.html Jon Huntsman Sr. urged Mitt Romney on Friday to release more tax returns and said he feels "very badly" that the presumptive Republican presidential nominee "won’t be fair with the American people." This is a non-partisan issue: Huntsman, a supporter of Romney's campaign, made the remarks to Greg Sargent at the Washington Post. He said, "I've supported Mitt all along. I wish him well. But I do think he should release his income taxes."